Portal Login Follow Us Interact with Us How Can I Buy?
 
Skip navigation links
Product Solutions
Services
Partner Programs
Interactive Resource Center
Events
About Us
Careers
Blogs
 
 

Everything You Need in a Phone...And Nothing You Don't 

Posted on 30 Nov 2009 by Joe Staples
Interactive Intelligence
Joe Staples
With any good purchase, you want to include the functions/features you need, but exclude the functions/features you don't. Otherwise, you either miss out on things you need (under buy) or pay too much for things you'll never use (over buy). As an example, when buying a car, do you really need the super-duty, hydraulic, self-aligning towing package built strong enough to allow you to move a house? No, because the chances of you moving a house by hitching it to your car are pretty remote (okay, keep reading, I do have a point here).

The same is true with the purchase of a business telephone handset. Does it make sense to try and cram elaborate functionality into a phone with a small display and its cumbersome multi-button interface, when all of that functionality can be accessed much better via your desktop computer with its full size monitor, keyboard, and mouse?

In our research, we have found that businesses are looking for four key attributes from the telephone handset:

1. A quality audio path
2. Affordability
3. Simplicity
4. Rich functionality

Those first three items are made available with a telephone endpoint that in essence is "dumbed down." The fourth item is then achieved by using a rich desktop software application. For contact center agents and headset converts, doesn't that just make sense to you?

The smart guys from Gartner stated..."While IP desk phones increasingly offer sophisticated functionality, their complexity and cost are barriers for adoption among many organizations. Though the use of USB headsets with softphones offers an alternative, reliability issues often preclude their use. We've been telling clients for awhile now to lower their infrastructure costs by deploying low-cost phones, while supporting advanced telephony features via PC-based call control applications. By further distilling that endpoint device down to its core functionality, organizations can realize even more savings while still maintaining a clear voice signal and advanced features."

They got it right -- lower your cost and increase your functionality. Does it get any better than that?

So I, and others, have blogged on this topic for the last nine months. See:

http://www.inin.com/Blog/archive/2009/01/26/whats-in-a-phone.aspx
http://www.inin.com/Blog/archive/2009/01/29/Non-Need-for-a-phone.aspx
http://www.inin.com/Blog/archive/2009/04/22/media-phones.aspx
http://www.inin.com/Blog/archive/2009/11/12/sip-softphone-versus-sip-hard-phone.aspx

When we started the Interactive Intelligence blog crew, we committed to not be self promoting. So in that spirit, I will introduce you to the only two devices on the market that I know of that fit the bill of delivering everything you need in a phone and nothing you don't. The first is from Plantronics and is called the Plantronics IP40. The second is from Interactive Intetelligence and is called the Interaction SIP Station.

Plantronics IP40
http://www.plantronics.com/north_america/en_US/products/office/headset-connectors/ip40

Interaction SIP Station

http://www.inin.com/ProductSolutions/Pages/Interaction-SIP-Station.aspx

I'm not trying to sell you a phone, BUT I am trying to sell you on the concept of letting desktop software applications do what they do best and letting telephone endpoints do what they do best...not mixing up those priorities...and saving money in the process.

As always...very interested in your comments and point of view. Know of another low-function, low-cost telephone device? Let me know who makes it and I'll add it here.

Joe Staples -- Dumb Phone Advocate
 
 
Enterprise-wide communication applications in an OCS world

Watch demo
Using your communications system to automate core business processes

Download whitepaper
Third party study outlines successful migration strategies

Download report
Tags: Contact Center, Market Trends and News, Best Practices, Enterprise IP Telephony
Share this post:

Comments


Ismael commented on Tuesday, 1-Dec-2009
 
The only shortcoming i see with these devices it's that if one, by any means, isn't able to start his PC, or it becomes frozen by the way, there's barely something you can do with them.
I'm thinking about this call you forgot to do that comes to your mind just when you're ready to leave the office and already switched off the computer..
This devices can have their room in the Contact Center, but I see difficult for them to get business users hearts


Joe Staples commented on Tuesday, 1-Dec-2009
 
Isamel, I can't really dissagree with your point. The device provides basic physical functionality for emergency dialing without the use of the desktop software application, but to your point, you can't make regular outbound calls without the software application. I will point out that for a business, that provides added security. Nobody can go to an open cubicle, pick up a phone and call their brother in China. There is also a cost tradeoff. Phones can be 5%-10% of the total communications system purchase price. That adds up. Moving to a basic device like this can save tens of thousands of dollars on a system with a fair amount of users. Will these devices make it into the mainstream enterprise. I agree with you that they won't in any significant quantity. That said, this is a slam dunk arguement for use in the contact center.


Ismael commented on Tuesday, 1-Dec-2009
 
Thanks for your response, John.
Of course, i see these devices as a nice cost-effective alternative over the full-featured and really expensive conventional deskphones.
In my opinion, security it's not a complete valid argument, because nowadays essentially any PBX system lets you secure the physical extension prompting you for a password to dial any number if you're not logged into the extension with a CTI desktop software in which you must have authenticated against.
Cost is, undoubtedly, the stronger selling point for these devices. However, nowadays it's not difficult to find some cheap chinese SIP endpoints (with a dial-pad included) for 40 bucks. You can argue about the quality and realiability of these endpoints and lack of full integration with PBX features, of course, but especially for business users, i feel it can be difficult for them to relinquish the freedom of having a quick access dial pad in their devices to make calls.

Submit Comment

* - Denotes Required Field
Name: *
URL:
Email:
Comments:
CAPTCHA: *
 
     
Portal  |  Interact  |  Buy  |  Privacy Policy  |  Legal