Portal Login Follow Us Interact with Us How Can I Buy?
 
Skip navigation links
Product Solutions
Services
Partner Programs
Interactive Resource Center
Events
About Us
Careers
Blogs
 
 

"Big Brother" Is Monitoring Your Work 

Posted on 30 Sep 2009 by Rachel Wentink
Interactive Intelligence
Rachel Wentink

A recent article in The Economist titled “Big Brother Bosses” commented that more and more companies are using software to monitor their employees’ behavior. According to the article, in these days of financial stress, there’s been a communications breakdown between management and employees, and managers are turning to new tools to combat “presenteeism” – a syndrome where employees show up for work every day, but then get very little work done.

For those of us from the contact center, the need to see how employees are performing isn't that radical. We’re used to an environment in which everybody can be measured for productivity, quality, customer satisfaction and schedule adherence. Similarly, in manufacturing organizations such as Toyota’s, productivity and quality measurements are considered a standard part of daily business. Not to mention schedule adherence—you can’t build something if someone isn’t there on the line.

It isn’t such a stretch to imagine that managers of knowledge workers also want to know how much work their employees are performing, and whether or not the work meets a quality standard. The capability exists today to produce reports of calls and email activity, including the nature of the activity and the duration, as well as the parties with whom an employee has interacted; reports can also be produced on back office work items handled by the employee.

 Such information wouldn’t benefit just the manager—the employees themselves could find it useful. While it might feel intimidating to know that at any point your manager can see how much work you’ve handled that day, it could extend accountability throughout back office teams. For productive workers, it could demonstrate their value to the organization, and where teams are overworked, provide hard data to back up their requests for additional head count.

Adding workforce management and recording/scoring technology could enable back office teams to better plan out head count and training needs, as well as assist management in mentoring employees for career development purposes. While these technologies are now taken for granted in the contact center, they could significantly improve operations in the back office.

So my question to our blog readers is this: would you view this as beneficial technology, or as “spyware”? If you could have technology that could help answer that difficult question of “What did I do at work today?”, and could point out where you were spending the bulk of your time, would you view it as helpful and embrace it? Would it help you adjust your work accordingly, so that you were spending time on the things you really needed to? Or would you simply see it as intrusive and another step by Big Brother?

Thanks in advance for your thoughts,

Rachel Wentink

 
 
Enterprise-wide communication applications in an OCS world

Watch demo
Using your communications system to automate core business processes

Download whitepaper
Third party study outlines successful migration strategies

Download report
Tags: Best Practices, Market Trends and News, Enterprise IP Telephony
Share this post:

Comments


Chris Vitek commented on Friday, 9-Oct-2009
 
Rachel,

It's not so much about surveillance as it is about sizing the workforce to the task, not some financial metric or budget.

My company, Enterprise Telemetry, makes open-systems software that monitors the utilization of any network-connected device (phones, PC, cell phones, etc...). We have had success in the back-office in the outsourcing and financial industries. Large groups of employees that handle similar tasks that are spread over multiple facilities seems to be a sweet spot. Compliance does not seem to come into play, nor does managing quality. These issues are already handled by other systems or processes.

Based on my experience, the desire for sophisticated workforce optimization tools is rampling up. Contact center implementation have proven the technique to be viable. Now, managers outside of the contact center are evaluating and implementing tools that will mimic the success in the contact centers.


thinker commented on Tuesday, 20-Oct-2009
 
hi Rachel,
I like your post. I would not take it as a spyware, for companies whose concerns are merely on the quantity of employees, I think it is reasonable for them to know how much their employees are performing.


Rachel Wentink commented on Wednesday, 21-Oct-2009
 
Thinker, I'm glad you see it that way. I will admit, on a separate forum, I have also received very negative responses, where people took it as a sign of the ultimate breakdown in communication between management and their employees. It is true that these tools could be used in a negative way. But the truth is that if an organization is motivated enough and wanted to "spy" on you, they'll find other means to do so. I honestly believe workforce optimization tools can assist knowledge workers and ultimately make their jobs more rewarding, and I agree with Chris that the desire for these tools outside the contact center is growing.

How do the other readers feel about workforce optimization tools in the enterprise? Too much? Or has the time come to adopt them outside the contact center?

Thanks,

Rachel

Submit Comment

* - Denotes Required Field
Name: *
URL:
Email:
Comments:
CAPTCHA: *
 
     
Portal  |  Interact  |  Buy  |  Privacy Policy  |  Legal